On my way this afternoon to the local grocery to pick up some dog food, I was listening to a new program on the local talk radio station. The program was called, I think, “The Allen Hunt Show-Where Faith and Reality Meet.” The main topic of discussion was the covering of the “IHS,” an ancient symbol of Jesus, by Georgetown University during a speech by President Obama. The callers provided both sides of the question without a corresponding “hand-wringing” rant by the host. What transpired was what many would consider a polite, intelligent, rational discussion of the situation. I know it is hard to believe, but there seems, at first glance, to be two sides to this story.
First of all, let me state that I am what the government considers a “right wing extremist,” since I meet all the criteria in the recently published Department of Homeland Security alert. Secondly, I am a recent convert to Catholicism. That means to the majority in Washington and academia that I am a nut.
However, I understand that if Obama had delivered his speech below the IHS sign, the right wing press would have predictably criticized him for trying to be the new Messiah. Georgetown University approved the request of the White House to cover all references to Georgetown University as well as all references to Catholicism and Jesus because the the Obama administration considers the normal backdrop for such speeches to be the American Flag. Georgetown complied and the result is an uproar from the right in that Georgetown University denied its faith by covering up the IHS.
I don’t believe that the thought of denial ever occurred to the majority of those in charge of Georgetown. The opportunity to bask in the popularity of the new President and his attendant media blinded them to anything other than their chance to bathe in secular popularity. The President, the President, did you hear me, the President, not some vague idea of a crusading Jesus, was coming to Georgetown University. All else paled beside the glorious chance at publicity associated with the fifteen minutes that Obama was speaking. Since this was a secular event, Georgetown in the spirit of Political Correctness saw nothing wrong with covering a sacred symbol. After all, they had complied with many secular requests before (they don’t pray, they have abortions, they don’t care about marriage). They gave no thought to the fact that they were in essence denying a part of who they were supposed to be in response to a chance for a collective ten minutes of fame. Were they right or wrong? I don’t know, but the majority of the outrage seems to be coming from the quarter that have adopted a stance of Obama Derangement Syndrome-from the same ones who derided the Left for hating everything Bush comes a policy of hating everything Obama.
Several of the persons associated with Georgetown, at least in the interview segments that were selected to be aired on this show, indicated that there was very little concern associated with the decision. After all, the Catholic faith is of very little concern to the majority at Georgetown. To cover the IHS is only a small concern in the day of relativism and political correctness. As I have pointed out several times in my blogs about Notre Dame, the majority, a vast majority, of Catholics and Notre Dame students, alumni, and faculty have remained silent in the controversy surrounding Obama and his degree. In an apostate church, this silence speaks volumes more than any attempt at rationalization or appeasement. Jesus and the Faith is outdated, outmoded, and the truly intelligent just ignore it even when they are priest, bishop, or professor. After all, the brilliant know more than the unwashed minions, and besides the Pope he ain’t even American. (In the interest of Political Correctness’s and national lack of sense of humor, I must point out that the previous two sentences were sarcastic satire.) Between the big yawn and the smug tsk-tsks, the students, administration, and faculty are shaking their heads and wondering if they can get tickets to Sex Positive Week, which mysteriously coincides with the first week of Lent. Just in case you wanted to know, Olivia Chitayat, Georgetown Sex Positive Week student organizer (she has a title!!), described Sex Positive as a movement promoting events, classes, and media aimed at helping people become comfortable in the unique sexual lifestyles. It is not far from covering the cross to the approval of sex positive week during Lent.
The question that Hunt kept asking on his program is why Obama chose Georgetown for this speech when there were other venues in Washington. The answer is power and arrogance. Everytime that a secular administration of any kind shows the world how religious leaders and institutions kow-tow to that administration, they demonstrate the power of secularism over Christianity. To Obama, he is Obama-the winner-the one the world has chosen to lead America down a “new path.” To paraphrase T. S. Eliot, this is the way the church ends, this is the way the church ends, this is the way the church ends, “not with a bang,but a whimper.”